For the emergency physician navigating infertility or pregnancy loss, the inherent stresses of a demanding career are compounded by a physical environment that is uniquely unforgiving. The emergency department rarely offers a predictable schedule, little protected downtime, and no “light duty” even when external factors may demand one.
Female physicians already experience significantly higher rates of infertility and pregnancy complications compared to the general population. A survey of 4,533 female physicians found that compared to the general population, female physicians were older at first pregnancy, more often underwent infertility evaluation and treatment, and had higher rates of miscarriage and preterm birth [1]. Among female physicians surveyed, 36.8% reported a personal history of infertility, with more than half requiring in vitro fertilization (IVF) to conceive, which is substantially higher than the 6-19% infertility rate in the general U.S. population [2]. A 2024 systematic review similarly identified that approximately one in four female physicians is affected by infertility, with female physicians reporting IVF utilization rates as high as 76%, which far exceeds the general population [3].
Physicians delay childbearing relative to nonphysicians, with only 2% having children before completing medical school and mean age at first birth of 32 years compared to 27 years for nonphysicians. This pregnancy delay places physicians into advanced maternal ages, when risks of infertility and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes are more pronounced [4]. For emergency physicians specifically, these risks are further amplified by the structural realities of shift work, including overnights, and a culture that has historically ignored pregnancy as a medical condition warranting accommodation.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 observational studies involving 196,989 women found that working fixed night shifts was associated with increased odds of miscarriage [5]. Night shift work demonstrated a dose-response relationship with early spontaneous pregnancy loss. Women working two or more night shifts per week have a 32% increased risk of miscarriage after pregnancy week 8 [6]. A separate prospective cohort study of 22,744 Danish hospital workers corroborated this finding, and also noted that women who worked 26 or more night shifts between weeks 4 and 22 of pregnancy were more than twice as likely to miscarry [6]. A meta-analysis specifically examining shift work found that night shifts were associated with an increased risk of early spontaneous pregnancy loss [7]. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists acknowledges that night shift work appears to confer a slight to modest increased risk of miscarriage, though more research is needed in the area [8]. Night shift work has also been linked to hormonal disruption, irregular menstruation, and failed embryo implantation - mechanisms mediated by circadian rhythm disruption and suppression of melatonin, which plays a critical role in placental function and early pregnancy maintenance [9]. Miscarriage is prevalent among female emergency medicine physicians, and just as prevalent are stories of women working shifts while actively miscarrying or immediately after. The culture of Emergency Medicine that causes women to work while suffering a miscarriage fails to acknowledge the profound grief and long term psychological effects associated with early pregnancy loss [10].
The psychological consequences of pregnancy loss are substantial and frequently underestimated. Between 25-50% of women who experience early pregnancy loss develop clinically significant negative mental health responses, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A 2017 meta-analysis found that the prevalence of complicated grief following perinatal loss was nearly three times higher than after other types of loss [10]. These effects are not limited to the birth parent: research shows that 66.3% of male partners of women experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss also show signs of anxiety, and 19% meet criteria for depression [11]. Emergency physicians - who are already at elevated risk for burnout and psychological distress - face this grief in an environment that historically provides no space for it.
IVF is a multi-step process in which eggs are retrieved from the ovaries, fertilized with sperm in a laboratory, and the resulting embryo is transferred to the uterus. The process unfolds over weeks to months and requires time-sensitive monitoring appointments, hormone injections, and procedures that often cannot be rescheduled. The nature of IVF monitoring and procedures are difficult to reconcile with the mandate of emergency medicine. Short sleep duration and shift/night work schedules may all adversely affect female fertility and IVF outcomes, including by reducing the number of mature oocytes retrieved and lowering clinical pregnancy rates, so anticipatory support is crucial for physicians undergoing the procedure [12, 13]. A 2022 prospective cohort study found that women working evening, night, or rotating shifts had on average 2.3 fewer mature oocytes retrieved than day-shift workers, and poor sleep quality has been independently associated with a 50% reduction in IVF success rates [14].
It is also important to recognize the toll of IVF on partners. The emotional and logistical toll of IVF cycles and the psychological impact of pregnancy loss affect both partners, regardless of who is physically carrying the pregnancy. Research demonstrates that partner support is critical during fertility treatment, with men's infertility stress associated with their partners' low levels of partner support [15]. Finally it should be noted that IVF carries large financial costs, often tens of thousands of dollars per cycle, and is frequently not covered by employer-sponsored insurance plans. Proactive institutional advocacy for comprehensive fertility benefits is therefore both a retention and an equity issue [3].
Emergency medicine departments should be aware that federal law now explicitly supports many of the protections described in this policy [16]. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), which took effect on June 27, 2023, requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodations for workers with known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. The EEOC’s final implementing regulations, effective June 18, 2024, explicitly include infertility, fertility treatments, and miscarriage within the scope of covered conditions. This means that scheduling accommodations for IVF cycles and time off for pregnancy loss are not merely aspirational policies - they may be legally required. Departments are encouraged to consult with their institution’s legal and human resources teams to ensure compliance.
Additionally, the PWFA prohibits employers from requiring employees to take leave if another reasonable accommodation (such as a schedule modification) would allow them to continue working [16]. This is directly relevant to the shift-swap and cancellable-shift frameworks described in this policy.
I. Immediate Sick Call for Loss
II. IVF Scheduling Protection (Patients and Partners)
III. No Penalty for Accommodation
IV. Insurance Coverage
V. Mental Health and Peer Support Infrastructure
Suggested Ways to Implement
Make Sick Call Policy Inclusive of Pregnancy Related Conditions
Build an Early Disclosure Culture
Shift Swapping Support
Administrative/ Low Lift Clinical Coverage
Designate a Departmental Point of Contact
Ensure PWFA Compliance
Does the PWFA require accommodation for partners of physicians undergoing IVF?
What if a physician does not want to disclose the reason for needing to schedule accommodations?
Does this policy unfairly benefit women in the Department?
Pregnancy loss and infertility treatment are often ignored in Emergency Medicine despite being occupational health issues with direct implications for physician safety, wellbeing, and workforce retention. The emergency department is not a forgiving environment under ordinary circumstances; it is far less so when a physician is mid-cycle, grieving, or physically recovering from a loss that most of their colleagues will never know occurred.
The policies outlined here ask departments to plan ahead, build flexibility into existing infrastructure, and treat physicians navigating these experiences with the same standard of care we would want for ourselves. The cost of implementation is modest but the cost of inaction is far greater.
By allowing birthing parents and non-birth partners access to flexible scheduling and "cancellable" shifts, departments acknowledge that physician wellness and workforce retention are rooted in the stability of the physician's home life. Workplace policies relating to managing fertility treatment and support from colleagues and employers is associated with reduced psychological distress, yet such policies are reported by less than one quarter of all employees undergoing fertility treatment, and likely much less for physicians [18].
Emergency medicine cannot retain the workforce it needs while continuing to treat pregnancy and fertility as personal problems to be managed in private. These are shared institutional responsibilities, and they require a proactive institutional response. As federal law now increasingly reflects - through the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act and related protections - the accommodation of physicians navigating fertility treatment and pregnancy loss is not only the right thing to do; it is the law [11].
[1] Lai K, Huang G, Santillan MK, et al. High Infertility Rates and Pregnancy Complications in Female Physicians Indicate a Need for Cultural Change. Acad Med. 2023;98(2):221–227. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004972. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36250327/
[2] Bakkensen JB, Smith KS, Cheung EO, et al. Childbearing, Infertility, and Career Trajectories Among Women in Medicine. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(7):e2326192. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26192. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37498595/
[3] Bhamra SK, Chahal H, Kaur S. Infertility Among Healthcare Professionals: A Comprehensive Review. EMJ Reproductive Health. 2024. Available at: https://www.emjreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Editors-Pick-Infertility-Among-Healthcare-Professionals-A-Comprehensive-Review.pdf
[4] Stentz NC, Griffith KA, Perkins E, et al. Fertility and Childbearing Among American Female Physicians. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(10):1059–1065. doi:10.1089/jwh.2015.5638. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8094034/
[5] Rangel EL, Castillo-Angeles M, Easter SR, et al. Incidence of Infertility and Pregnancy Complications in US Female Surgeons. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(10):905–915. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3301. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34319353/
[6] Begtrup LM, Specht IO, Hammer PEC, et al. Night Work and Miscarriage: A Danish Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(5):302–308. doi:10.1136/oemed-2018-105592. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30910992/
[7] Stocker LJ, Macklon NS, Cheong YC, Bewley SJ. Influence of Shift Work on Early Reproductive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):99–110. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000327. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24901274/
[8] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Employment Considerations During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 733. 2018. Available at: https://www.acog.org/-/media/project/acog/acogorg/clinical/files/committee-opinion/articles/2018/04/employment-considerations-during-pregnancy.pdf
[9] Rangel EL, Janczewski LM, Castillo-Angeles M, et al. Pregnancy and Motherhood During Surgical Training. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(7):644–652. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0153. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12713819/
[10] Hariton E, Matthews B, Burns EM, et al. Gender Disparities in Infertility Experiences Among Physicians. F S Rep. 2023;4(1):45–52. doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2022.12.003. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9937061/
[11] Varda BK, Glover M, Tarin T, et al. Pregnancy and Fertility Among Female Physicians. Urology. 2021;148:133–139. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.017. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33039130/
[12] Stentz NC, Griffith KA, Perkins E, et al. Childbearing and Fertility Experiences Among Female Physicians. Acad Med. 2021;96(3):456–463. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003822. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33054981/
[13] Rangel EL, Castillo-Angeles M, Easter SR, et al. Delayed Childbearing and Infertility Among Female Surgeons. Ann Surg. 2022;276(5):e793–e800. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005598. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36261696/
[14] Weiss J, Teuscher D, Griffith KA, et al. Reproductive Health and Infertility Among Women Physicians. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01597-8. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8764829/
[15] Finch SJ. Pregnancy During Residency: A Literature Review. Acad Med. 2003;78(4):418–428. doi:10.1097/00001888-200304000-00013. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12691977/
[16] U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Summary of Key Provisions of EEOC’s Final Rule to Implement the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). 2024. Available at: https://www.eeoc.gov/summary-key-provisions-eeocs-final-rule-implement-pregnant-workers-fairness-act-pwfa
[17] Creedy DK, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, et al. Psychological Wellbeing and Reproductive Challenges Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024;31(2):e2980. doi:10.1002/cpp.2980. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cpp.2980
[18] Stack SW, McKinney CM, Spiekerman C, et al. Childbearing and Maternity Leave in Residency: Determinants and Well-being Outcomes. Acad Med. 2018;93(11):1630–1637. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002300. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29658362/
[19] Richard RM, et al. Infertility among healthcare professionals: a comprehensive review. EMJ Repro Health. 2024;10(1):61–68.
[20] Lee CY, et al. Impact of night shift work on women's fertility, pregnancy and menopause. Frontiers in Sleep. 2025;4:1545258.
[21] Cuenca D. Pregnancy loss: consequences for mental health. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023;4:993668.
[22] Habibi F, et al Relationship between sleep disturbances and in vitro fertilization outcomes in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. 2025;15(2):e70303.
[23] MacVane CZ, et al. Scheduling practices for pregnant emergency medicine residents. AEM Educ Train. 2022;6(6):e10813.
[24] Cai C, et al. The impact of occupational shift work and working hours during pregnancy on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(6):563–576.
[25] Reschini M, et al. Women's quality of sleep and in vitro fertilization success. Sci Rep. 2022;12:17678.
[26] Beroukhim G, et al. Impact of sleep patterns upon female neuroendocrinology and reproductive outcomes: a comprehensive review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022;20:14.
[27] American Academy of Emergency Medicine / Women in Emergency Medicine. Scheduling Recommendations During Pregnancy, the Postpartum Period, and Parental Leave. Joint YPS-AAEM and WiEM-AAEM Statement. 2024.
[28] FemInEM Working Group. Best-Practice Recommendations for Clinical Scheduling During Pregnancy. ACEP Now. January 2020.